Cold Boot Attacks: Vulnerable While Sleeping

Cold Boot Attacks: Vulnerable While Sleeping

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Cold Boot Attacks: Vulnerable While Sleeping Monty Solomon 02-29-2008
Posted by Monty Solomon on February 29, 2008, 9:01 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Cold Boot Attacks: Vulnerable While Sleeping

February 26th, 2008 by Ed Felten

Our research on cold boot attacks on disk encryption has generated
lots of interesting discussion. A few misconceptions seem to be
floating around, though. I want to address one of them today.

As we explain in our paper, laptops are vulnerable when they are
"sleeping" or (usually) "hibernating". Frequently used laptops are
almost always in these states when they're not in active use - when
you just close the lid on your laptop and it quiets down, it's
probably sleeping.

When a laptop goes to sleep, all of the data that was in memory stays
there, but the rest of the system is shut down. When you re-open the
lid of the laptop, the rest of the system is activated, and the
system goes on running, using the same memory contents as before.
(Hibernating is similar, but the contents of memory are copied off to
the hard drive instead, then brought back from the hard drive when
you re-awaken the machine.) People put their laptops to sleep, rather
than shutting them down entirely, because a sleeping machine can wake
up in seconds with all of the programs still running, while a fully
shut-down machine will take minutes to reboot.

...

http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1258


Network Magic 20% Off NMEASY coupon code spring banner 468x60
Posted by Rick Merrill on March 1, 2008, 7:32 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Monty Solomon wrote:
...
>
> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1258
>

There is some good discussion at the above forum,
but that is not the same as peer-review. While the
research is stimulating, Ed (not Monty) Felten makes a
few small errors. First, anybody knows that clear
code is in RAM if you let the system sleep/stand-by.
No secure system should be permitted to use that state.
Second, as Lazlo Hars points out, no encryption key
should be stored in RAM, but I'll bet a lot of s/w
does exactly that. - RM


Similar ThreadsPosted
Cold Boot Attacks on Disk Encryption February 23, 2008, 5:24 pm
DECT For Local Loop: 'Boot up Time'. April 2, 2005, 3:22 am
Analysts Say ATM Systems Highly Vulnerable August 3, 2005, 1:25 am
Cyberspeak: Boot Camp Will Start Exodus to Windows April 14, 2006, 2:14 pm
Analysts: ATMs Highly Vulnerable to Fraud August 3, 2005, 10:36 pm
Re: Analysts: ATMs Highly Vulnerable to Fraud August 5, 2005, 7:42 pm
Chicago Voter Info Vulnerable to Hackers October 24, 2006, 5:04 pm
Online Banking Industry Very Vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting March 15, 2005, 11:53 am
Re: Cold Weather and Christmas December 23, 2005, 2:32 am
Plugboard at cold war UK defense site [Telecom] July 15, 2008, 7:01 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map