CCNA - ICND question - help

CCNA - ICND question - help

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 alt.certification.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
CCNA - ICND question - help HEY! 07-15-2007
Posted by HEY! on July 15, 2007, 6:07 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


I need help on a question from the CCNA-ICND test.

I didn't pass for a second time, and got the exact same score of
837/1000. 849 is a pass.

I believe this problem is what I've been getting wrong:

2 things needed:
- correct addressing on RtrA
- correct LAN config on RtrB

Server & Host Y need to be able to communicate.

Connections:
Host consoled to RtrA

RtrA s0/0 connected to RtrB s0/0
RtrA fa0/0 connected to Sw1

Sw1 connected to Server 10.1.1.148/24

RtrB fa0/0 connected to Sw2

Sw2 connected to Host Y 192.168.3.28/24

Config's:

RtrA:
s0/0
192.168.2.5/30

fa0/0
10.1.1.147/24

rip 10.0.0.0
rip 192.168.2.0

RtrB:
192.168.2.6/30

fa0/0
192.168.3.27/24
shut

rip 192.168.2.0
rip 192.168.3.0

Of course I enable RtrB fa0/0, which is half of the answer.
I can't figure out any problems with the addressing on RtrA.

Can someone help me? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks


Posted by Klutz on July 16, 2007, 1:40 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


RtrA:
s0/0
192.168.10.5/24
fa0/0
10.1.1.147/24

rip 10.0.0.0
rip 192.168.2.0

RtrB:
192.168.10.6/24

fa0/0
192.168.3.27/24
shut

rip 192.168.2.0
rip 192.168.3.0


>I need help on a question from the CCNA-ICND test.
>
> I didn't pass for a second time, and got the exact same score of
> 837/1000. 849 is a pass.
>
> I believe this problem is what I've been getting wrong:
>
> 2 things needed:
> - correct addressing on RtrA
> - correct LAN config on RtrB
>
> Server & Host Y need to be able to communicate.
>
> Connections:
> Host consoled to RtrA
>
> RtrA s0/0 connected to RtrB s0/0
> RtrA fa0/0 connected to Sw1
>
> Sw1 connected to Server 10.1.1.148/24
>
> RtrB fa0/0 connected to Sw2
>
> Sw2 connected to Host Y 192.168.3.28/24
>
> Config's:
>
> RtrA:
> s0/0
> 192.168.2.5/30
>
> fa0/0
> 10.1.1.147/24
>
> rip 10.0.0.0
> rip 192.168.2.0
>
> RtrB:
> 192.168.2.6/30
>
> fa0/0
> 192.168.3.27/24
> shut
>
> rip 192.168.2.0
> rip 192.168.3.0
>
> Of course I enable RtrB fa0/0, which is half of the answer.
> I can't figure out any problems with the addressing on RtrA.
>
> Can someone help me? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks
>

Posted by HEY! on July 16, 2007, 4:28 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Thanks Klutz, but would you mind explaining why you'd change the
serial int's from:
192.168.2.5/30
192.168.2.6/30
to
192.168.10.5/24
192.168.10.6/24 ... ?

I understand RIPv1 is classful, but isn't subnetting to /30 allowed ?
This isn't VLSM, correct?


Posted by Klutz on July 16, 2007, 10:03 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


I know it isn't VLSM, but RIP version1 don't announce the subnet mask.
So,on RTA,192.168.2.5/30 and 192.168.2.0/24 are in the same network
.Router's interface should connect different network. You announce the
network 192.168.2.0 on fa0/0 of RTA,how it determine the packet's export?
s0/0 or fa0/0?


> Thanks Klutz, but would you mind explaining why you'd change the
> serial int's from:
> 192.168.2.5/30
> 192.168.2.6/30
> to
> 192.168.10.5/24
> 192.168.10.6/24 ... ?
>
> I understand RIPv1 is classful, but isn't subnetting to /30 allowed ?
> This isn't VLSM, correct?
>

Posted by pk on July 17, 2007, 3:34 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options


Klutz wrote:

> I know it isn't VLSM, but RIP version1 don't announce the subnet mask.
> So,on RTA,192.168.2.5/30 and 192.168.2.0/24 are in the same network

Where are you seeing that?
The original config is this (rewritten in IOS format):

RtrA

int s0/0
ip address 192.168.2.5 255.255.255.252

int fa0/0
ip address 10.1.1.147 255.255.255.0

router rip
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.2.0


RtrB

int s0/0
ip address 192.168.2.6 255.255.255.252

int fa0/0
ip address 192.168.3.27 255.255.255.0
shutdown

router rip
network 192.168.2.0
network 192.168.3.0


Server (10.1.1.148/24) connected to RtrA's LAN
Host Y (192.168.3.28/24) connected to RtrB's LAN


So, other than doing "no shutdown" on RtrB's fa0/0 and adding "version 2" to
both rip configs, I don't see what else can be wrong here.


Similar ThreadsPosted
CCNA / ICND Exam Simulation Question Help October 29, 2007, 8:57 pm
Cisco Press - ICND Study Question July 18, 2006, 3:08 pm
ICND 2.2 content on CCNA? November 2, 2005, 8:13 pm
CCNA Intro and CCNA ICND for Sale September 23, 2005, 4:28 am
Using NetSim for CCNP with CCNA ICND Guide June 13, 2006, 1:21 am
INTRO& ICND or CCNA Full Exam June 21, 2006, 6:26 pm
CCNA ICND config/fault scenarios September 17, 2006, 5:17 pm
Re: Hi Folks - Anyone have current CCNA ICND test questions? TIA !! December 20, 2005, 8:56 pm
Re: Hi Folks - Anyone have current CCNA ICND test questions? TIA !! December 21, 2005, 4:19 am
Selling CCNA ICND study guide on eBay June 15, 2006, 2:25 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map