Bell System trivia...  [Telecom]

Bell System trivia... [Telecom]

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.telecom  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Bell System trivia... [Telecom] Al Gillis 05-27-2008
Posted by Al Gillis on May 27, 2008, 7:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I was looking at some old Bell System information a few days ago and
wondered this: How many states had more than one Bell System company
serving their territory? Since we're coming up on the 25th anniversary of
the AT&T divestiture (on 1-1-09) I thought we should dust off our knowledge
and memories and share them with A.D.T. readers

I didn't have a definitive reference source for my question and could only
think of three examples (see below). But surely there are more.

Who can name them?

The three I know of are Oregon (Pacific Northwest Bell and Mountain Bell
[dba Malheur Home Telephone Company]), Idaho (PNB and Mountain Bell) and
Ohio (Ohio Bell and Cincinnati Bell [which I think was really the Cincinnati
and Suburban Telephone Company]



Al


Posted by Ron Kritzman on May 29, 2008, 7:08 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Al Gillis wrote:
> Since we're coming up on the 25th anniversary of
> the AT&T divestiture (on 1-1-09) I thought we should dust off our knowledge
> and memories and share them with A.D.T. readers

Right after the divestiture I was working on a paging terminal installed
in a Bell CO. There was Bell System blue/yellow stripe tape run across
the floors, around racks, up the walls and all over to mark what was
whose. The the yellow (or was it blue?) side was the new entity and the
other was AT&T. I got a chuckle out of this, but the big laugh came when
I went to the men's room. Someone had run the tape up the wall, neatly
bisecting a urinal.

- Ron



--
remove the letters in caps to reply


Posted by on May 29, 2008, 11:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> Right after the divestiture I was working on a paging terminal installed
> in a Bell CO. There was Bell System blue/yellow stripe tape run across
> the floors, around racks, up the walls and all over to mark what was
> whose. The the yellow (or was it blue?) side was the new entity and the
> other was AT&T.

The history of Mountain Bell ("Muttering Machines to Laser Beams")
tells that they did the taping as well. But it was very hard to do
since so much of the equipment was in shared service and hard to
assign to one company or the other. They made arbitrary decisions
they knew made no sense, but had no choice.

Too bad no one back then ever compiled the cost of divesture.


Posted by Bill on May 30, 2008, 10:20 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote in

>
>> Right after the divestiture I was working on a paging terminal
>> installed in a Bell CO. There was Bell System blue/yellow stripe tape
>> run across the floors, around racks, up the walls and all over to
>> mark what was whose. The the yellow (or was it blue?) side was the
>> new entity and the other was AT&T.
>
> The history of Mountain Bell ("Muttering Machines to Laser Beams")
> tells that they did the taping as well. But it was very hard to do
> since so much of the equipment was in shared service and hard to
> assign to one company or the other. They made arbitrary decisions
> they knew made no sense, but had no choice.
>
> Too bad no one back then ever compiled the cost of divesture.
>
>

The true cost of divestiture was in the many jobs that were lost due to
the new environment that was created by the courts in the name of
competition.

The Bell Telephone split was beneficial to the them MCI's of the world.
It also gave legacy telepone companies the ability to venture into other
business lines only to fail (AT&T - Olivetti/NCR).

Not to mention a near collapse of all telephone manufacturing in the US
(WECo with a French accent)!!!

The great consolidation in Telecom as embodied with the remaining
Verizon & the New AT&T empires are a tribute to the final act of
1/1/1984.


Bill


Similar ThreadsPosted
re: Bell System trivia... [Telecom] May 28, 2008, 8:28 am
Re: Bell System Trivia May 30, 2008, 9:50 pm
Bell System 'binary'? [telecom] February 15, 2008, 12:23 pm
[telecom] Bell System binary - one more item... February 17, 2008, 9:14 pm
Bell System Technical Journal--Reason for publication? [Telecom] February 23, 2008, 5:22 pm
History-- Bell System hotel/motel PBX services? [telecom] April 22, 2008, 12:31 am
Bell System history--Switching 1925-1975 [telecom] July 11, 2008, 4:34 pm
Re: [telecom] How's Pat? [Telecom] (now Old Bell System) April 13, 2008, 8:22 pm
History -- last Bell System crank (magneto local battery) phones? [telecom] August 14, 2008, 2:57 pm
Re: History -- last Bell System crank (magneto local battery) phones? [telecom] August 16, 2008, 1:56 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map