Baystack 470's and Fiber

Baystack 470's and Fiber

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.nortel  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Baystack 470's and Fiber Mikhael47 01-12-2007
Posted by Mikhael47 on January 12, 2007, 12:32 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I have 4 BS 470's. Two are 48T's and the other two are 24T's. The two
48's are in our main building and the two 24's are in an adjacent
building. The pair of devices on each side are stacked.

I have two fiber loops joining the devices together. For a long time,
we had both GBICs connected at the same time (one on each unit).

This morning, we came in, and our entire network was down. The
activity lights on the ethernet drops were all on solid. After some
poking around I decided to yank one of the GBICs out and the network
calmed down.

Should one GBIC be active on each of the switches or is it OK to have 2
active (one from-to each switch)??

Is there any aggregate bandwidth increase or fault tolerance gained by
having both connected at once?

Alternatively is there any problems with plugging both loops in at the
same time?

Thanks

Mike


Posted by MC on January 12, 2007, 7:00 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Mikhael47 wrote:
> I have 4 BS 470's. Two are 48T's and the other two are 24T's. The two
> 48's are in our main building and the two 24's are in an adjacent
> building. The pair of devices on each side are stacked.
>
> I have two fiber loops joining the devices together. For a long time,
> we had both GBICs connected at the same time (one on each unit).
>
> This morning, we came in, and our entire network was down. The
> activity lights on the ethernet drops were all on solid. After some
> poking around I decided to yank one of the GBICs out and the network
> calmed down.
>
> Should one GBIC be active on each of the switches or is it OK to have 2
> active (one from-to each switch)??
>
> Is there any aggregate bandwidth increase or fault tolerance gained by
> having both connected at once?
>
> Alternatively is there any problems with plugging both loops in at the
> same time?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
either need to have MLT configured on each end or make sure spanning
tree is enabled on all fiber ports at each end, however spanning tree
will block one connection and keep the other up.

Posted by Mikhael47 on January 14, 2007, 12:30 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

> >
> either need to have MLT configured on each end or make sure spanning
> tree is enabled on all fiber ports at each end, however spanning tree
> will block one connection and keep the other up.

Ok, is MLT support from 470 to 470 or only from 470 to passports?

I will look into the spanning tree...


Posted by MC on January 14, 2007, 2:32 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Mikhael47 wrote:
>> either need to have MLT configured on each end or make sure spanning
>> tree is enabled on all fiber ports at each end, however spanning tree
>> will block one connection and keep the other up.
>
> Ok, is MLT support from 470 to 470 or only from 470 to passports?
>
> I will look into the spanning tree...
>
Nortel switch to any Nortel switch supports MLT


Similar ThreadsPosted
Baystack 460-24T-PWR Fiber Optic Module poblems August 4, 2005, 1:45 pm
Nortel option 21 to MCR via fiber October 20, 2005, 7:59 am
460 24T-PWR switch and fiber issue... February 1, 2006, 6:43 pm
Wich fiber connector do I need? March 21, 2007, 12:08 pm
PP8600 fiber ports failing February 15, 2005, 1:23 pm
Norstar MICS Fiber ASM Technical Expertise Required April 2, 2006, 9:18 am
Baystack 450 & 470 July 17, 2005, 11:44 pm
Pb with baystack 450 September 12, 2007, 4:57 am
baystack 450-24t 470-48t March 2, 2008, 8:32 am
Baystack 470 not booting March 4, 2005, 2:11 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map