ALL incoming ports now BLOCKED on Comcast

ALL incoming ports now BLOCKED on Comcast

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.modems.cable  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
ALL incoming ports now BLOCKED on Comcast Charles Newman 09-07-2006
Posted by Charles Newman on September 17, 2006, 8:15 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
X-No-Archive: Yes

> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:12:13 -0700, "Charles Newman"
>
>
> >> They do not, they change them periodically to prevent people from
> >> doing things they should not be doing. They figure if it is too hard
> >> people will move up to the Business level and get a static ip address
> >> and everything else that makes life sooo much easier.
> >>
> >
> > Well, what I am doing is paying Live 365 $24.95 per month
> >to connect over a VoIP link to their servers, and then people
> >connect to the Live 365 servers to listen. The connection on
> >my end takes no more bandwidth that was any other VoIP
> >connection, such as Skype, would take. I use their Live
> >Studio software, which creates a VoIP link to Live 365,
> >and then the listeners connect to there, so I am taking a lot
> >less bandwidth than you might think. I take up no more
> >bandwidth than I would for Skype, Vonage, or any
> >VoIP service. I connect to Live365 at 32K, and then
> >the listeners connect to Live365. The Live365 servers
> >are merely a "middle man", as it were, acting as a relay
> >between my computer and my listeners, and I am paying
> >$26.95 per month for the privelege of being able to
> >broadcast. I connect to Live365, and Live365 takes
> >all the listener connections.
> >
> I am not saying what you are doing is anything more than anyone else
> is doing, I am saying that Comcast doesn't like what you are doing.
> You can take that or leave it, but it is what Comcast thinks.
> And as far as Skype, that maybe the next thing Comcast goes after.
> Bandwidth is bandwidth to them, it makes no difference how it is used,
> just that some use alot more than others. It is a Business decision,
> nothing personal.

Well, like I said, it appears to have been just a technical glitch, as
I can suddenly connect to the Live 365 server again. I just finished
another edition of my show, and had no problems today.

As for blocking, that can be evaded using an open Socks 5 proxy
server. They would know you went to the Socks server, but they
would not know where you went beyond that server. Its just
like Cox appears to be blocking people from listening to some
Live 365 broadcasts. I had a caller into my show the other day
who could not connect directly from her Cox cable modem
service, but when she went through an open Socks proxy, she
was able to listen to my show with no problem. This was on
Cox in the Las Vegas area, she had problems connecting.
Cox would know she went to an open Socks 5 proxy server,
but Cox would not know what she did beyond that server.

>



Posted by on September 18, 2006, 5:08 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

f/fgeorge wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:12:13 -0700, "Charles Newman"
>
>
> >> They do not, they change them periodically to prevent people from
> >> doing things they should not be doing. They figure if it is too hard
> >> people will move up to the Business level and get a static ip address
> >> and everything else that makes life sooo much easier.
> >>
> >
> > Well, what I am doing is paying Live 365 $24.95 per month
> >to connect over a VoIP link to their servers, and then people
> >connect to the Live 365 servers to listen. The connection on
> >my end takes no more bandwidth that was any other VoIP
> >connection, such as Skype, would take. I use their Live
> >Studio software, which creates a VoIP link to Live 365,
> >and then the listeners connect to there, so I am taking a lot
> >less bandwidth than you might think. I take up no more
> >bandwidth than I would for Skype, Vonage, or any
> >VoIP service. I connect to Live365 at 32K, and then
> >the listeners connect to Live365. The Live365 servers
> >are merely a "middle man", as it were, acting as a relay
> >between my computer and my listeners, and I am paying
> >$26.95 per month for the privelege of being able to
> >broadcast. I connect to Live365, and Live365 takes
> >all the listener connections.
> >
> I am not saying what you are doing is anything more than anyone else
> is doing, I am saying that Comcast doesn't like what you are doing.
> You can take that or leave it, but it is what Comcast thinks.
> And as far as Skype, that maybe the next thing Comcast goes after.
> Bandwidth is bandwidth to them, it makes no difference how it is used,
> just that some use alot more than others. It is a Business decision,
> nothing personal.

If he really wants to run a radio station on Live 365, without being
blocked or detected, he should try Tor, which is a new online privacy
and security tooll that uses military grade encryption that is actually
used by the United States Armed Forces. Anything sent through Tor
cannot be cracked, sniffed, or analised. As one person once said "The
book would be open, but the pages would all be in an unreadable
language". The United States Government is using it in the War on
Terror, so America's enemies cannot intercept any sensitive
communications, the security is THAT good. All levels of government in
the United States are using Tor to secure their communications, that is
how good it is.


Posted by Gene S. Berkowitz on September 19, 2006, 12:23 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
chilly8@hotmail.com says...
>
> f/fgeorge wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:12:13 -0700, "Charles Newman"
> >
> >
> > >> They do not, they change them periodically to prevent people from
> > >> doing things they should not be doing. They figure if it is too hard
> > >> people will move up to the Business level and get a static ip address
> > >> and everything else that makes life sooo much easier.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Well, what I am doing is paying Live 365 $24.95 per month
> > >to connect over a VoIP link to their servers, and then people
> > >connect to the Live 365 servers to listen. The connection on
> > >my end takes no more bandwidth that was any other VoIP
> > >connection, such as Skype, would take. I use their Live
> > >Studio software, which creates a VoIP link to Live 365,
> > >and then the listeners connect to there, so I am taking a lot
> > >less bandwidth than you might think. I take up no more
> > >bandwidth than I would for Skype, Vonage, or any
> > >VoIP service. I connect to Live365 at 32K, and then
> > >the listeners connect to Live365. The Live365 servers
> > >are merely a "middle man", as it were, acting as a relay
> > >between my computer and my listeners, and I am paying
> > >$26.95 per month for the privelege of being able to
> > >broadcast. I connect to Live365, and Live365 takes
> > >all the listener connections.
> > >
> > I am not saying what you are doing is anything more than anyone else
> > is doing, I am saying that Comcast doesn't like what you are doing.
> > You can take that or leave it, but it is what Comcast thinks.
> > And as far as Skype, that maybe the next thing Comcast goes after.
> > Bandwidth is bandwidth to them, it makes no difference how it is used,
> > just that some use alot more than others. It is a Business decision,
> > nothing personal.
>
> If he really wants to run a radio station on Live 365, without being
> blocked or detected, he should try Tor, which is a new online privacy
> and security tooll that uses military grade encryption that is actually
> used by the United States Armed Forces. Anything sent through Tor
> cannot be cracked, sniffed, or analised. As one person once said "The
> book would be open, but the pages would all be in an unreadable
> language". The United States Government is using it in the War on
> Terror, so America's enemies cannot intercept any sensitive
> communications, the security is THAT good. All levels of government in
> the United States are using Tor to secure their communications, that is
> how good it is.

Comcast does not really care WHAT you're serving, just how much
bandwidth you are consuming; they can turn him off for talking too much
about puppies.

..and from my reading, it appears that Tor uses SSL key generation for
encryption, so while it is very good, it certainly isn't "military
grade".

--Gene

Posted by Charles Newman on September 26, 2006, 7:17 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
X-No-Archive: Yes

message


[snip]

It turns out the problem was not Comcast, this time. I just read on
the special broadcaster website that one of their servers was
acting flaky, and some broadcasters and listeners could not
connect. It is a relief to know that the problem was not with
Comcast.



Posted by BR on September 28, 2006, 1:59 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:17:11 -0700, Charles Newman wrote:

> It is a relief to know that the problem was not with Comcast.

Whew! Good thing you didn't jump the gun. <g>

Similar ThreadsPosted
ATA with 2 FXS ports and 1 LAN & 1 WAN Port----GS-26 November 17, 2005, 3:12 am
Re: Does Adelphia block ports? November 27, 2005, 9:35 am
Does Adelphia block ports? November 23, 2005, 7:17 pm
Re: IMPORTANT!! ALL COMCAST Subscribers!! PLZ READ! COMCAST COMCAST November 1, 2006, 11:36 am
Re: IMPORTANT!! ALL COMCAST Subscribers!! PLZ READ! COMCAST COMCAST November 6, 2006, 2:04 pm
Comcast November 15, 2005, 5:33 pm
What is it with Comcast DNS September 17, 2006, 4:46 pm
What up with Comcast DNS? October 26, 2006, 2:54 pm
Comcast MTU August 27, 2007, 10:16 pm
dns timeouts on comcast.net March 15, 2005, 8:51 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map