ADSL router for a medium size network. any recomendations please?

ADSL router for a medium size network. any recomendations please?

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.sys.cisco  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
ADSL router for a medium size network. any recomendations please? =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fernando_Peral 06-02-2008
Posted by =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fernando_Peral on June 2, 2008, 2:19 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi



We have a network with about 200 computers, but normaly only about 50
will be connectod to internet at the same time. We have a cheap ADSL
router (a tipical personal router) which hangs several times a day when
there are many connections. We are thinking on changing the router and
we are thinking on the following router

Cisco 857 Integrated Services Router puertos
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6197/index.html
http://www.optize.es/servlet/CISCO_857_INTEGRATED_SERVICES_ROUTER_-_E_258837_optize.html




we need ADSL2+, NAT, ethernet 100, we dont need wifi.



it will be a correct choice or it will be too "small" and we will need a
1800 series router?





thanks

Posted by Thomas Dzubin on June 2, 2008, 3:05 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
> We have a network with about 200 computers, but normaly only about 50
> will be connectod to internet at the same time. We have a cheap ADSL
> router (a tipical personal router) which hangs several times a day when
> there are many connections. We are thinking on changing the router and
> we are thinking on the following router
> Cisco 857 Integrated Services Router puertos
<snip>
> we need ADSL2+, NAT, ethernet 100, we dont need wifi.
> it will be a correct choice or it will be too "small" and we will need a
> 1800 series router?

Yes, I think your hunch about the 1800 series is correct
The 800-series is fine for really small offices with ten workstations,
but if you're going to be having 50 (and with the CPU overhead of NAT and
maybe firewall if you buy the Advanced IOS), you may want to go up one
level and go for the 1801.

Plus, with the 1801, you get an 8-port switch included instead of a 4-port
switch.

The price difference isn't too bad. (I'm in Canada)
A quick check seems to show I can get an 857 for about $400 and an 1801
for $1,000

ThomasDzubin


Posted by jcle on June 2, 2008, 5:23 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
I agree with the first post I would just like to add that the 1800
series will allow upgrades is you decided to use the modular
fuctionality


Thomas Dzubin wrote:
> > We have a network with about 200 computers, but normaly only about 50
> > will be connectod to internet at the same time. We have a cheap ADSL
> > router (a tipical personal router) which hangs several times a day when
> > there are many connections. We are thinking on changing the router and
> > we are thinking on the following router
> > Cisco 857 Integrated Services Router puertos
> <snip>
> > we need ADSL2+, NAT, ethernet 100, we dont need wifi.
> > it will be a correct choice or it will be too "small" and we will need a
> > 1800 series router?
>
> Yes, I think your hunch about the 1800 series is correct
> The 800-series is fine for really small offices with ten workstations,
> but if you're going to be having 50 (and with the CPU overhead of NAT and
> maybe firewall if you buy the Advanced IOS), you may want to go up one
> level and go for the 1801.
>
> Plus, with the 1801, you get an 8-port switch included instead of a 4-port
> switch.
>
> The price difference isn't too bad. (I'm in Canada)
> A quick check seems to show I can get an 857 for about $400 and an 1801
> for $1,000
>
> ThomasDzubin

Posted by CK on June 3, 2008, 2:47 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Go with 1801 as it will be customized and used in better way then 800
series.
Moreover later you can run IPSEC etc with that router

Posted by Charles N Wyble on June 3, 2008, 3:01 am
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options

Wow a couple DSL threads today. :)

I also would recommend the 1800 series. I'm using it at home (just a few
systems connected) but it has all the functionality I need.

Using a cisco 1841. No expansion ports as of yet, but I am thinking
about adding in an aironet module.

Charles

jcle wrote:
> I agree with the first post I would just like to add that the 1800
> series will allow upgrades is you decided to use the modular
> fuctionality
>
>

Similar ThreadsPosted
configuration of a router Cisco 1700 on ADSL max of a wide-area network February 10, 2006, 4:49 am
Recomendations for a small MeetingPlace setup June 14, 2006, 11:18 am
adsl router to adsl router April 30, 2007, 11:54 pm
837 ADSL Router No NAT Configuration November 10, 2005, 8:47 am
Simple ADSL Router with PIX November 26, 2005, 6:26 pm
! help with Cisco 837 ADSL Router March 30, 2006, 7:03 am
QoS on ADSL Router cisco 826 June 9, 2006, 6:13 am
Cisco 827 ADSL Router February 25, 2007, 9:52 pm
Set up router and wic1-adsl January 7, 2008, 3:08 pm
Which version of SSH is available on Cisco 837 ADSL router? July 23, 2004, 8:39 am

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map