100BASE-TX Scrambler Problem

100BASE-TX Scrambler Problem

NewsGroups | Search | Tools
 comp.dcom.lans.ethernet  Post an article  get this group's latest topics as an RSS feed add this group's latest topics to your My MSN content add this group's latest topics to your My Yahoo content  add this group's latest topics to your Google content  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
100BASE-TX Scrambler Problem Woody Brison 06-12-2008
Posted by Woody Brison on July 8, 2008, 2:58 pm
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
wrote:
> In article
>
> [snip]
>
> > It would appear from these statements that the ANSI standard
> > X3.263-1995 has it wrong. =A0The Scramber cannot issue zeros
> > between frames, it must continue thru its 2047-state sequence.
>
> > How is it all these PHY designers knew to ignore that one
> > specific line of code in the spec? =A0For we put a scope on the
> > twisted pair coming out of the wall, and we could not find an
> > example of an interframe sequence of Idle codes. Whatever brand
> > of PHY is sending this signal, is not following the ANSI spec but
> > instead keeps the LFSR running between frames. As I suspect all
> > of them do.
>
> > Any hints, Rich?
>
> As I am not a Verilog guru, I cannot speak to the meaning or validity of
> the code cited. However, it should be clear that 100BASE-TX does a
> "scramble-AFTER-encode", and that the scrambler is never turned in a
> twisted-pair PHY, except perhaps for test purposes.
>
> Of course, in a fiber medium (100BASE-FX), there is no need for the
> scrambler, as there will be no EMI generated from the fiber pulses.
> Perhaps the cited section of the standard and the code reflect
> 100BASE-FX, rather than -TX?
>
> It is possible that there is a typo in the ANSI standard, but I doubt
> that something this catastrophic would have gone unnoticed this long.
>
> --
> Rich Seifert =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Networks and Communications Consu=
lting
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 21885 Bear Creek Way
> (408) 395-5700 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Los Gatos, CA 95033
> (408) 228-0803 FAX
>
> Send replies to: usenet at richseifert dot com

I'm going to proceed with my design, arrange the scrambler to
run all the time. We'll be connecting this to various other
commercial PHYs and we'll see if they play together, that's
the bottom line. I'll keep you posted from time to time.
Least I can do for the help you (all) have been.

Wood

Similar ThreadsPosted
Routing problem December 12, 2005, 3:48 pm
Problem with WAP and LAN connection September 4, 2006, 7:21 am
Problem: UTP only works at 10 MHz July 27, 2007, 8:02 pm
problem on LAN or firewall November 22, 2007, 7:21 am
baffling speed problem July 23, 2005, 2:52 am
Problem with Crossover Cable August 28, 2005, 1:18 pm
Problem with 2 NAT boxes behind a router February 10, 2006, 12:23 pm
Network configuration problem September 7, 2007, 7:23 am
Help with debugging 10/100/1000Base-T PHY problem July 31, 2008, 12:22 am
3Com switches and 1000Base SX problem July 14, 2005, 9:45 pm

other useful resources:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Telecommunications Industry Association
Electronic and Software Security Products and Services
International Telecommunication Union

Custom CGI Perl and PHP programming by 1-Script.com

Contact Us | Privacy Policy
The site map in XML format XML site map